As healthcare systems across Europe deal with an increasing prevalence of cognitive impairment, family doctors are emerging as key players in assessing and supporting patients’ decision-making capacities.
This was a central theme here at the 29th WONCA Europe Conference, where the European Young Family Doctors Movement (EYFDM) presented insights from a project conducted across Europe, involving young general practitioners who participated in workshops held in multiple countries.
“Family doctors are the linchpin in these decisions,” said Alina Zidaru, MD, from the Irish College of Physicians, Dublin. “They understand the patient’s history, build long-term relationships, and are best positioned to ensure that decisions reflect the patient’s values, not just what the law or the family might say.”
Zidaru and her colleague, Nick Mamo, MD, member of EYFDM in Glasgow, United Kingdom, emphasized the central role family doctors play in ensuring that patient rights and preferences are respected, regardless of their cognitive state. They are often the first to identify cognitive impairments and must carefully navigate the legal and ethical landscape of decision-making support.
“Often, we focus too much on avoiding harm and overlook the principle of autonomy,” said Mamo. “But it’s essential to give patients the right to make their own decisions, even when those decisions might seem unwise to us.”
The Case of Jay
Zidaru told Medscape Medical News, “We’ve conducted workshops in Brussels, Vienna, and Sydney, focusing on how to build habits that support patients. We presented real-life cases, like Jay, a 43-year-old man with trisomy 21 and a moderate intellectual disability who must decide whether to undergo surgery for a hernia. The most significant challenge was ensuring continuity of care and respecting his autonomy, despite cognitive limitations.”
Jay’s case illustrates the complex ethical dilemmas faced by family doctors when balancing autonomy with patient safety. In many cases, cognitive impairments raise concerns about whether a patient can make decisions independently.
During the session, the audience was asked to share their thoughts on the case and to indicate whether they would allow Jay to make his own decision, and if they felt confident in assessing his cognitive capacity. The responses revealed a range of mixed feelings.
Legal and Cultural Variations Across Europe
The session also explored how different European countries approach decision-making for cognitively impaired individuals. A clear divide exists between nations that give family members automatic decision-making rights and those that require legal appointments.
In the United Kingdom, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 presumes capacity unless proven otherwise. Family doctors can assess patients’ decision-making abilities using any validated tool they find suitable. They should also aim to ensure that decisions are made in the patient’s best interests if they lack capacity. Family members only have legal authority if appointed through formal means, such as a lasting power of attorney.
In Spain and Italy, functional assessments are performed when patients retain decision-making authority in areas where they demonstrate competence. Legal guardianship can be appointed by the courts, sometimes limited to specific areas, but it is intended to support rather than replace the patient’s autonomy.
In France and Portugal, guardianship may be implemented in specific domains, but the patient’s ability to participate in decisions is always prioritized.
In Turkey, according to Turkish general practitioners in the audience, the courts and close family members often share the decision-making responsibility.
Zidaru added that Ireland’s Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015 introduced significant changes to how cognitive impairment is managed there. “Ireland adopted a standardized functional test of capacity, used by any doctor. A person can still make decisions as long as they understand, retain, and weigh the information needed to make that choice. If their capacity diminishes, a decision-making assistant, co-decision maker, or representative can be appointed, but the patient’s will and preferences always come first.”
Family Doctors, a Growing Responsibility
“It’s not just about the legal framework: it’s about cultural awareness and early communication,” added Mamo. “We have to ask ourselves: Do patients have the right to make bad decisions? And how do we, as family doctors, respect that while still ensuring their safety?”
The session concluded with a discussion on how the role of family doctors in decision-making for cognitively impaired patients will evolve as populations age and the incidence of conditions like dementia increases. The workload is rising, and the need for clear, consistent guidelines is critical.
“Family doctors will continue to play a central role in managing these challenges,” Zidaru emphasized. “But we need more resources, more education, and more support to ensure we can respect patient autonomy without compromising their well-being.”
Daniela Ovadia, MD, is the editor-in-chief of Univadis Italy, a Medscape Network platform.